70sFan wrote:Gooner wrote:Bucks were just outclassed and Giannis couldn't do nothing about it. Great players have to take over these games and he can't do it consistently due to his limited skillset.
Giannis had three 40+ games in that series...Legacy damaging loss for CP, I know people love him on this board. It's hard to defend this. It shows once again the difference between a champion and someone who is just a great player, and please don't put CP ahead of great players who have the ring.
Legacy damaging game for 37 years old midget? I guess 1992 series was legacy damaging for Isiah Thomas, as he was only 33...
Giannis was still relatively inefficient in this series and Celtics dominated them when it matterd the most. Last 2 games they won convincingly, and this one was an epic blowout.
I don't like age excuses for a player like CP who has still been playing so well throughout the season, and his team aswell. If you are still great then you have to be great when it matters. In today's sport in general you see plenty of people playing great in mid to late 30's. Age excuse for CP doesn't apply imo. He was great in previous series, surely he didn't age so much in 2 weeks. Like I said, there is a difference between champions and the rest.