ImageImage

ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis

jute2003
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,198
And1: 2,574
Joined: Feb 20, 2013
     

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1701 » by jute2003 » Wed Jun 8, 2022 8:06 pm

I would listen to arguments for eliminating the corner 3. I dont want to see them change court or ball dimensions though.
only a fan, only an opinion
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 63,145
And1: 41,682
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1702 » by emunney » Wed Jun 8, 2022 8:15 pm

I'm not sure if I'd expect the ball dimensions changing to have a disproportionate effect on outside shooting. Every shot would be harder, ball-handlers would be devastated, deflections would go up. It would be a disaster. Not that it would ever happen.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1703 » by WeekapaugGroove » Wed Jun 8, 2022 8:30 pm

Flopping should be treated like a flagrant foul. It's not a basketball play. Put it on the flagrant system with points and suspensions and make it something they can retroactively hit guys with after reviewing the tape.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
Licensed to Il
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,681
And1: 3,264
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
 

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1704 » by Licensed to Il » Wed Jun 8, 2022 8:34 pm

WeekapaugGroove wrote:Flopping should be treated like a flagrant foul. It's not a basketball play. Put it on the flagrant system with points and suspensions and make it something they can retroactively hit guys with after reviewing the tape.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app


Serious question, but also please read it in a Milhouse nerd voice: with the on court speed tracking equipment already in place, doesn’t the league already have the infrastructure in place to conclusively prove what is a flop? Wouldnt the data be different on a flop than a guy that got legitimately steamrolled? Like Weep said, you could retroactively punish floppers.
DingleJerry
RealGM
Posts: 15,330
And1: 11,013
Joined: Jul 09, 2015
       

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1705 » by DingleJerry » Wed Jun 8, 2022 8:38 pm

WeekapaugGroove wrote:Flopping should be treated like a flagrant foul. It's not a basketball play. Put it on the flagrant system with points and suspensions and make it something they can retroactively hit guys with after reviewing the tape.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app


I'd even have it be an in game thing to review. Not by the refs on the floor, but someone in NY watching replays to buzz in and assess a flagrant/T or whatever they want to call it for egregious flops. Reward 1 or 2 FTs for it at next stoppage. Sure, you'd have to have a high standard to be an egregious flop but this would greatly reduce most of the ridiculous ones that we've all laughed at Boston for this playoffs.
Resident Lillard truther since 2015.
User avatar
sidney lanier
Head Coach
Posts: 7,251
And1: 10,492
Joined: Feb 03, 2012
Location: where late the sweet birds sang

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1706 » by sidney lanier » Wed Jun 8, 2022 8:45 pm

emunney wrote:I'm not sure if I'd expect the ball dimensions changing to have a disproportionate effect on outside shooting. Every shot would be harder, ball-handlers would be devastated, deflections would go up. It would be a disaster. Not that it would ever happen.


I agree that there isn't one chance in a thousand they would ever adopt this change, but if they did I think it would affect shots pretty much as a function of distance, mostly because of the difference in the ball-to-rim ratio, not the size of the ball (NBA players would have no problem with a slight ball size change, at least for shooting, but I agree deflections/steals would go up).

As for ball-handling, this guy seems OK with the 33" ball. (At least I think that's what he's dribbling.)

https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Oversized-33-Basketball-size-9-basketball_62228992935.html
"The Bucks in six always. That's for the culture." -- B. Jennings
User avatar
FlagsFlyForever
General Manager
Posts: 8,543
And1: 5,404
Joined: Feb 21, 2013

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1707 » by FlagsFlyForever » Wed Jun 8, 2022 10:07 pm

Licensed to Il wrote:Serious question, but also please read it in a Milhouse nerd voice: with the on court speed tracking equipment already in place, doesn’t the league already have the infrastructure in place to conclusively prove what is a flop? Wouldnt the data be different on a flop than a guy that got legitimately steamrolled? Like Weep said, you could retroactively punish floppers.

I don't think SportVU has that capability currently but the technology does exist.

Read on Twitter
Antinomy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,786
And1: 7,618
Joined: Mar 18, 2017

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1708 » by Antinomy » Wed Jun 8, 2022 10:09 pm

FlagsFlyForever wrote:
Antinomy wrote:Widening the court is interesting but it poses new problems — like the defense having to cover even more ground & 5-out offenses would become the even more norm.

You think guys are shooting too much now, just wait until the defenders have to close out from the paint to a now extra 2 feet to the corners.

To me, the most obvious change is making the mid-range jumper worth more in some regard.

As of now, any basket from 1-23 feet is worth 2 points but 24 feet & beyond is worth 3 — “analytically” it makes no sense to shoot from 15-20 feet because it’s worth the same as a shot from much closer.

The idea is to make the three point line far enough so that not only does it lower 3P% across the board and every player would attempt fewer threes, but also many players who currently shoot threes would stop shooting them entirely.


Only problem is: pushing the line 1-2 feet further back simply makes it the same distance across the court, but the shot itself isn’t necessarily more difficult,

NBA guys are already acclimated to shooting from that 24 foot distance— it would just be from a different angle.

I feel like that change would hurt defenses more because they already have to cover too much ground. The injuries might start piling up.

Adjusting the value of the mid-range shot would vastly improve overall shot diversity while not compromising the defense, imo.

Either that, or eliminating the corner 3 altogether
Antinomy
Head Coach
Posts: 6,786
And1: 7,618
Joined: Mar 18, 2017

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1709 » by Antinomy » Wed Jun 8, 2022 10:16 pm

While we’re at it, the 3 second rule needs to abolished at some point.

It literally serves no purpose at this point with teams running 5-out offenses anyway.

Freedom of movement needs to apply to the defenses too.
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1710 » by WeekapaugGroove » Wed Jun 8, 2022 10:55 pm

Antinomy wrote:While we’re at it, the 3 second rule needs to abolished at some point.

It literally serves no purpose at this point with teams running 5-out offenses anyway.

Freedom of movement needs to apply to the defenses too.
Defensive 3 second? I disagree, I'd actually go the opposite way and actually call that more. Hell I might even go back to the old man d rules so defenders actually have to stay with guys on the perimeter. I think one of the reasons teams shoot so many 3s is defenses have gotten too good at taking away the paint. Which leaves 3s and long 2s so teams shoot the 3. If you open the paint up for offenses I think that would reduce 3s.

Like I was saying earlier I think removing the corner 3 would actually have an unintended effect of teams taking even more 3s because the paint would be packed.

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
User avatar
FlagsFlyForever
General Manager
Posts: 8,543
And1: 5,404
Joined: Feb 21, 2013

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1711 » by FlagsFlyForever » Wed Jun 8, 2022 11:46 pm

Antinomy wrote:
FlagsFlyForever wrote:
Antinomy wrote:Widening the court is interesting but it poses new problems — like the defense having to cover even more ground & 5-out offenses would become the even more norm.

You think guys are shooting too much now, just wait until the defenders have to close out from the paint to a now extra 2 feet to the corners.

To me, the most obvious change is making the mid-range jumper worth more in some regard.

As of now, any basket from 1-23 feet is worth 2 points but 24 feet & beyond is worth 3 — “analytically” it makes no sense to shoot from 15-20 feet because it’s worth the same as a shot from much closer.

The idea is to make the three point line far enough so that not only does it lower 3P% across the board and every player would attempt fewer threes, but also many players who currently shoot threes would stop shooting them entirely.


Only problem is: pushing the line 1-2 feet further back simply makes it the same distance across the court, but the shot itself isn’t necessarily more difficult,

NBA guys are already acclimated to shooting from that 24 foot distance— it would just be from a different angle.

I feel like that change would hurt defenses more because they already have to cover too much ground. The injuries might start piling up.

Adjusting the value of the mid-range shot would vastly improve overall shot diversity while not compromising the defense, imo.

Either that, or eliminating the corner 3 altogether

NBA teams make corner threes at approximately a 39% rate. Moving the corner three back would absolutely make that shot more difficult.

Take Brook Lopez for example. Since he started shooting threes over the past six seasons, Brook is a 41% three point shooter in the corner (338 attempts). When he's not in the corner, Brook is a 33% three point shooter (1545 attempts).




Read on Twitter
User avatar
stellation
RealGM
Posts: 16,063
And1: 9,555
Joined: Dec 13, 2005
Location: *inaudible*

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1712 » by stellation » Thu Jun 9, 2022 1:03 am

Was that acknowledgement of troops a Memorial Day thing or just a regular American life thing?
#FreeChuckDiesel
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 24,538
And1: 20,241
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1713 » by WeekapaugGroove » Thu Jun 9, 2022 1:09 am

Some home cooking?

Read on Twitter
?t=5U6ywGd0bTVDKOUQb74_rw&s=19

Sent from my SM-G986U using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
Milbucks96
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,369
And1: 2,745
Joined: Mar 10, 2019
   

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1714 » by Milbucks96 » Thu Jun 9, 2022 1:14 am

You can’t post up no more, defender falls down with any contact.
User avatar
blazza18
RealGM
Posts: 56,867
And1: 29,666
Joined: Dec 02, 2010
Location: Upside Down
       

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1715 » by blazza18 » Thu Jun 9, 2022 1:20 am

Steph's first foul was awful and Boston went at him over and over to get his 2nd.

Brown having one of those stretches again where he looks like the best player in the league.
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
User avatar
Matches Malone
RealGM
Posts: 37,333
And1: 27,471
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
     

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1716 » by Matches Malone » Thu Jun 9, 2022 1:25 am

Milbucks96 wrote:You can’t post up no more, defender falls down with any contact.


It's the gold standard of playing defense in 2022, unfortunately.
Gery Woelfel wrote:Got a time big boy?
Milbucks96
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,369
And1: 2,745
Joined: Mar 10, 2019
   

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1717 » by Milbucks96 » Thu Jun 9, 2022 1:26 am

Warriors are going to get blown out but old heads will look at the score and blame the 3 pointers
User avatar
VooDoo7
RealGM
Posts: 25,957
And1: 22,292
Joined: Jan 14, 2012
Location: WI

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1718 » by VooDoo7 » Thu Jun 9, 2022 1:32 am

I have an idea. Just leave the court and 3 point line the way that they are.
Mtsportsfan
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,371
And1: 414
Joined: Oct 21, 2017
     

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1719 » by Mtsportsfan » Thu Jun 9, 2022 1:42 am

VooDoo7 wrote:I have an idea. Just leave the court and 3 point line the way that they are.

Why ? They haven't change the court ever except adding the 3pt line . the players now a days are huge and athletic as hell . the court was designed for six ft white guys . make the court bigger all the way around , more movement . these guys are the best , make a touch more difficult. 3pt line is a joke .
User avatar
blazza18
RealGM
Posts: 56,867
And1: 29,666
Joined: Dec 02, 2010
Location: Upside Down
       

Re: ATL - Ham Slamwich to the Lakers 

Post#1720 » by blazza18 » Thu Jun 9, 2022 1:47 am

Tatum puts two hands on Wiggins and then has the audacity to complain lol.
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks