ImageImageImageImage

Who do you want us to take at #1?

Moderators: UCF, Knightro, UCFJayBird, Def Swami, Howard Mass, ChosenSavior

Who would you take at #1?

Jabari smith
111
51%
Chet Holmgren
63
29%
Paolo Banchero
27
13%
Jaden Ivey
1
0%
Keegan Murray
1
0%
Shaedon Sharpe
8
4%
Other
5
2%
 
Total votes: 216

User avatar
RookieStar
RealGM
Posts: 27,999
And1: 8,156
Joined: Jul 01, 2009
 

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1221 » by RookieStar » Sat Jun 11, 2022 12:00 am

Just curious, if we really are " all in " on JS, what does one bad workout really mean right?

If so, why does one workout really change the odds on the betting site? In the last draft, did any of the top 5 picks really affect the odds after workout? Like example, Jalen Green' s workout with DET, did it affect the odds that much?
User avatar
CarraT
Pro Prospect
Posts: 797
And1: 406
Joined: Jul 22, 2004
Location: Germany
   

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1222 » by CarraT » Sat Jun 11, 2022 12:31 am

RookieStar wrote:Just curious, if we really are " all in " on JS, what does one bad workout really mean right?

If so, why does one workout really change the odds on the betting site? In the last draft, did any of the top 5 picks really affect the odds after workout? Like example, Jalen Green' s workout with DET, did it affect the odds that much?


No, but Cade was a crystal clear No. 1 anyway. This year it’s so close between JS, Chet and maybe even Paolo, that Teams could use the workout as a tiebreaker
Fire Weltman!
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,558
And1: 14,990
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1223 » by basketballRob » Sat Jun 11, 2022 12:51 am

RookieStar wrote:Just curious, if we really are " all in " on JS, what does one bad workout really mean right?

If so, why does one workout really change the odds on the betting site? In the last draft, did any of the top 5 picks really affect the odds after workout? Like example, Jalen Green' s workout with DET, did it affect the odds that much?
It was probably the news that broke that we were going to workout Holmgrem is why the odds changed. No reports say that he had a bad workout.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
Bigmagicfan82
Starter
Posts: 2,485
And1: 345
Joined: Oct 06, 2003

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1224 » by Bigmagicfan82 » Sat Jun 11, 2022 12:57 am

Odds are manipulated by Vegas to influence betting patterns. Vegas prefers a more even amount amount of betting on a particular line. To many bets to one side of the line vs another is a risk to the house. So if a lot of bets are going one way they will change the odds to try and encourage betting the other direction. Most likely, with all the news of Jabari going first, most of the bets are for him going first. Most likely the odds were lowered to try and get more bets to Chet and Paolo. I wouldn’t read to much into it.


“ Why Do Betting Lines Move?
As we have seen, generally lines move because a large majority of money has been placed on one side of a single bet. The sportsbooks don’t like this because if all those bets win, they will lose money.

When the sportsbook wants to “balance the books” it will move the line to make that side of the bet more attractive.

In the example above, the Chiefs started out as favorites and attracted a lot of bets. This would have made the sportsbook concerned that they would lose money if the Chiefs won. In response, they gave the Ravens even more points so that more people would bet on them.

The most common reason for line movement is that the vast majority of public bettors are betting in one direction. Generally, the highest number of people betting on one side means that that side has the highest amount of money.”
https://www.wsn.com/betting-guide/line-movement/
User avatar
RookieStar
RealGM
Posts: 27,999
And1: 8,156
Joined: Jul 01, 2009
 

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1225 » by RookieStar » Sat Jun 11, 2022 1:13 am

basketballRob wrote:
RookieStar wrote:Just curious, if we really are " all in " on JS, what does one bad workout really mean right?

If so, why does one workout really change the odds on the betting site? In the last draft, did any of the top 5 picks really affect the odds after workout? Like example, Jalen Green' s workout with DET, did it affect the odds that much?
It was probably the news that broke that we were going to workout Holmgrem is why the odds changed. No reports say that he had a bad workout.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app


Seriously? Because we were gonna work.out Chet? Is that a joke? Of course we were gonna work out Chet and probably Paolo and Ivey as well.. what, when we next announce Paolo iw coming the odds are gonna go lower? Lol
User avatar
RookieStar
RealGM
Posts: 27,999
And1: 8,156
Joined: Jul 01, 2009
 

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1226 » by RookieStar » Sat Jun 11, 2022 1:16 am

CarraT wrote:
RookieStar wrote:Just curious, if we really are " all in " on JS, what does one bad workout really mean right?

If so, why does one workout really change the odds on the betting site? In the last draft, did any of the top 5 picks really affect the odds after workout? Like example, Jalen Green' s workout with DET, did it affect the odds that much?


No, but Cade was a crystal clear No. 1 anyway. This year it’s so close between JS, Chet and maybe even Paolo, that Teams could use the workout as a tiebreaker


Yeah to me and you Cade was the #1 but i bet a lot were thinking of Mobley as a dark horse as well... just curious of after a workout last drafr odds changed a lot..
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,558
And1: 14,990
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1227 » by basketballRob » Sat Jun 11, 2022 1:30 am

RookieStar wrote:
basketballRob wrote:
RookieStar wrote:Just curious, if we really are " all in " on JS, what does one bad workout really mean right?

If so, why does one workout really change the odds on the betting site? In the last draft, did any of the top 5 picks really affect the odds after workout? Like example, Jalen Green' s workout with DET, did it affect the odds that much?
It was probably the news that broke that we were going to workout Holmgrem is why the odds changed. No reports say that he had a bad workout.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app


Seriously? Because we were gonna work.out Chet? Is that a joke? Of course we were gonna work out Chet and probably Paolo and Ivey as well.. what, when we next announce Paolo iw coming the odds are gonna go lower? Lol
Teams don't always work everyone out.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
RookieStar
RealGM
Posts: 27,999
And1: 8,156
Joined: Jul 01, 2009
 

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1228 » by RookieStar » Sat Jun 11, 2022 1:40 am

basketballRob wrote:
RookieStar wrote:
basketballRob wrote:It was probably the news that broke that we were going to workout Holmgrem is why the odds changed. No reports say that he had a bad workout.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app


Seriously? Because we were gonna work.out Chet? Is that a joke? Of course we were gonna work out Chet and probably Paolo and Ivey as well.. what, when we next announce Paolo iw coming the odds are gonna go lower? Lol
Teams don't always work everyone out.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app



???? Are you serious? Or are you really believing the propaganda that we already have decided?

We have the #1 pick. If our FO doesn't do its job properly by selecting the best player for our team then they should be fired. The proper thing to do is do the process on ALL top 4-5 choices before deciding. Its different if a player declines the invitation from us.
Rainwater
RealGM
Posts: 12,465
And1: 7,446
Joined: Apr 02, 2017

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1229 » by Rainwater » Sat Jun 11, 2022 2:01 am

basketballRob wrote:
RookieStar wrote:
basketballRob wrote:It was probably the news that broke that we were going to workout Holmgrem is why the odds changed. No reports say that he had a bad workout.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app


Seriously? Because we were gonna work.out Chet? Is that a joke? Of course we were gonna work out Chet and probably Paolo and Ivey as well.. what, when we next announce Paolo iw coming the odds are gonna go lower? Lol
Teams don't always work everyone out.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app


Yes, the team with the number 1 draft pick likely does not work out all the guys in the draft. However, they most definitely workout the top prospects. That would be poor due diligence if they didn't. So yes guys like Chet, Jabari, Paolo, and Ivy will likely get a workout.
BlueBalls
Analyst
Posts: 3,116
And1: 991
Joined: Jun 13, 2015
Location: Gainesville, FL
         

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1230 » by BlueBalls » Sat Jun 11, 2022 2:07 am

I’m just not sold on Chet. Too many things can go horribly wrong. He’s going to have to put on weight, and added bulk may negatively affect his game. He didn’t look great in the NCAA’s, when he faced his best comp. Consistently pushed around, frequent foul trouble and his offensive game looked limited. Banchero is going to be a really good pro and I’d be ok with him, but Jabari is the guy. He’s more than just a shooter. People are typecasting him a bit much.

But I’m not going to whine about any of them. I could even live with a trade down to 4 to take Ivey if someone put a great package together for us.
If you see something suspicious, say something suspicious.
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,558
And1: 14,990
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1231 » by basketballRob » Sat Jun 11, 2022 2:13 am

Rainwater wrote:
basketballRob wrote:
RookieStar wrote:
Seriously? Because we were gonna work.out Chet? Is that a joke? Of course we were gonna work out Chet and probably Paolo and Ivey as well.. what, when we next announce Paolo iw coming the odds are gonna go lower? Lol
Teams don't always work everyone out.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app


Yes, the team with the number 1 draft pick likely does not work out all the guys in the draft. However, they most definitely workout the top prospects. That would be poor due diligence if they didn't. So yes guys like Chet, Jabari, Paolo, and Ivy will likely get a workout.
Teams can fall in love with a player and not workout anyone else. Pat Williams after he had just won the lottery said we were drafting Shaq.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app
Rainwater
RealGM
Posts: 12,465
And1: 7,446
Joined: Apr 02, 2017

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1232 » by Rainwater » Sat Jun 11, 2022 2:34 am

basketballRob wrote:
Rainwater wrote:
basketballRob wrote:Teams don't always work everyone out.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app


Yes, the team with the number 1 draft pick likely does not work out all the guys in the draft. However, they most definitely workout the top prospects. That would be poor due diligence if they didn't. So yes guys like Chet, Jabari, Paolo, and Ivy will likely get a workout.
Teams can fall in love with a player and not workout anyone else. Pat Williams after he had just won the lottery said we were drafting Shaq.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app


Lol, that is Shaq. There is no Shaq in this draft, lol.
You make it seem like there is a clear number 1. There isn't.
OrlandoNed
Head Coach
Posts: 6,740
And1: 4,878
Joined: Jul 31, 2013
 

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1233 » by OrlandoNed » Sat Jun 11, 2022 2:39 am

Image

I've found a picture from the future of Chet trying to post up literally anybody in the NBA.
User avatar
drsd
RealGM
Posts: 39,260
And1: 8,970
Joined: Mar 16, 2003
     

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1234 » by drsd » Sat Jun 11, 2022 7:48 am

basketballRob wrote:Teams don't always work everyone out.


For example: Vázquez was not worked out. And I cannot recall Hezonja being worked out either. As two example. :)


..
User avatar
fendilim
RealGM
Posts: 31,918
And1: 5,497
Joined: Jun 11, 2002
Location: 孫悟空, 时间太?!

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1235 » by fendilim » Sat Jun 11, 2022 10:27 am

drsd wrote:
basketballRob wrote:Teams don't always work everyone out.


For example: Vázquez was not worked out. And I cannot recall Hezonja being worked out either. As two example. :)


..

Suggs didn’t either
Image
User avatar
SOUL
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 59,286
And1: 41,037
Joined: Dec 11, 2006
Location: Orl★ndo
     

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1236 » by SOUL » Sat Jun 11, 2022 10:33 am

Isaac didn't either iirc.

Basically, nobody has had real intel on the Magic for a while lol.
www.rareslums.com // please support my writing!
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,558
And1: 14,990
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1237 » by basketballRob » Sat Jun 11, 2022 10:40 am

fendilim wrote:
drsd wrote:
basketballRob wrote:Teams don't always work everyone out.


For example: Vázquez was not worked out. And I cannot recall Hezonja being worked out either. As two example. :)


..

Suggs didn’t either
Neither did Bamba or Isaac.

Smith's workout reminded me of Wendell's and DSJ's. Both players we pranced out in front of the media and then picked someone else.

If Chet comes in next week and does a media session, we'll probably be picking Paolo.


Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
RookieStar
RealGM
Posts: 27,999
And1: 8,156
Joined: Jul 01, 2009
 

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1238 » by RookieStar » Sat Jun 11, 2022 11:10 am

SOUL wrote:Isaac didn't either iirc.

Basically, nobody has had real intel on the Magic for a while lol.


LOL. Sooooo.... is it Shaedon Sharpe, come on down time?
MAGICian619
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,475
And1: 923
Joined: Jul 16, 2007
Location: Orlando, Florida
         

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1239 » by MAGICian619 » Sat Jun 11, 2022 11:13 am

We really can’t compare this draft to others in terms of who the Magic are working out. Having the #1 pick changes everything. If anything, you would think our front office would want to parade these guys around just to show they are doing their due diligence.

There is a 0% chance the Magic take someone #1 overall that they didn’t workout.
MAGICian619
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,475
And1: 923
Joined: Jul 16, 2007
Location: Orlando, Florida
         

Re: Who do you want us to take at #1? 

Post#1240 » by MAGICian619 » Sat Jun 11, 2022 11:14 am

RookieStar wrote:
SOUL wrote:Isaac didn't either iirc.

Basically, nobody has had real intel on the Magic for a while lol.


LOL. Sooooo.... is it Shaedon Sharpe, come on down time?


Sharpe worked out for Magic last week I believe.

Return to Orlando Magic