Bolts wrote:I know plus minus is flawed but Wiggins +20 with 17 pts 16 rbs.
His rebounding, defense, and hustle was the 2nd most important factor in that win.
Moderators: Domejandro, ken6199, Dirk, infinite11285, Clav, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27, KingDavid, cupcakesnake
Bolts wrote:I know plus minus is flawed but Wiggins +20 with 17 pts 16 rbs.
Floody100 wrote:Absolutely mind boggling that the Celtics continue to play drop coverage against Steph & Klay on 3’s considering its basically became an open lay up for them both. I don’t know if it’s the coaches decision but seeing Horford consistently start to peddle back while guarding nobody when either one of them gets around the screen is excruciating to watch as a Celtics fan.
Raps in 4 wrote:Hello Brooklyn wrote:Tatum had a good game! Anyone who disagrees doesn't understand basketball. 11 rebounds and 6 assists!
Also Warriors can't win without Draymond. Kerr benching him was clearly the wrong decision! If you disagree you also don't know basketball.
Warriors can win without KD though. Anyone who disagrees doesn't understand basketball.

All these "when it matters" ridiculousness. Warriors aren't in the position to win if Curry doesn't do what he did the first three quarters. All of Wiggins great plays are for naught if Curry doesn't have his big 3rd quarter. Celtics trying to double Curry is what helped Looney get the layup late to put them up 5.JN61 wrote:og15 wrote:PistolPeteJR wrote:
Agreed. Wiggins was the difference.
The classic try and find whatever means possible to not credit Curry, lol.
Wiggins was great, but saying he was "the" reason as if another guy didn't drop 43 is funny
Did you watch the game? Wiggins was part of every play when they went like 8 point shift. Curry was 2-4 when it mattered on the 4th and padded his numbers a bit in the end when it was over.
Combine this all with elite defense all game long.
og15 wrote:dribble1614 wrote:Tatum is the most overrated player in the league. Unclutch bum.
I suppose it is impressive that they got to the finals with him being so unclutch
TheHartBreakKid wrote:Hell of a game
bmurph128 wrote:Diop wrote:What was that pass by curry?
Fatigue?
Nah weve seen that before. Just random extremely low IQ plays in big moments
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using RealGM mobile app
TheLand13 wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:TheLand13 wrote:
Can we stop with these horrific "Green shouldn't play" takes? Without him, they aren't a finals team. Stop.
He's been a negative in this game. His impact defensively hasn't made up for his utter ineptitude on offense.
Okay, try playing without him for an entire half and then come back to me with "can't play him in the second half". We saw what not having him around for most of the season did to the Warriors. Again, stop.azcatz11 wrote:TheLand13 wrote:
Can we stop with these horrific "Green shouldn't play" takes? Without him, they aren't a finals team. Stop.
No, we can't. He is clogging the paint worse than a 1995 chevy blazer.
Lmao I don't care. Warriors aren't doing dick without Draymond. Stop pretending that him not playing somehow gives them a better chance.
GusFring wrote:JN61 wrote:GusFring wrote:Idk how anyone can have magic over curry
Anyone who watched both would have Magic over Curry any day.
I did. Currys better

JN61 wrote:G R E Y wrote:People are crapping on Tatum but he's a 24-year-old player in his first finals versus a finals juggernaut.
It's crazy expectations.
I don't care about poor shooting but his terrible decision making and terrible shot selection. You can't have that no matter how young you are.



gst8 wrote:We got a series folks. Enjoy.

og15 wrote:All these "when it matters" ridiculousness. Warriors aren't in the position to win if Curry doesn't do what he did the first three quarters. All of Wiggins great plays are for naught if Curry doesn't have his big 3rd quarter. Celtics trying to double Curry is what helped Looney get the layup late to put them up 5.JN61 wrote:og15 wrote:The classic try and find whatever means possible to not credit Curry, lol.
Wiggins was great, but saying he was "the" reason as if another guy didn't drop 43 is funny
Did you watch the game? Wiggins was part of every play when they went like 8 point shift. Curry was 2-4 when it mattered on the 4th and padded his numbers a bit in the end when it was over.
Combine this all with elite defense all game long.
Wiggins had a great game, but he wasn't the reason they won, he was a reason. That's just a statement being made to try to make it seem like Curry didn't do some serious heavy lifting.

Sedale Threatt wrote:JN61 wrote:og15 wrote:The classic try and find whatever means possible to not credit Curry, lol.
Wiggins was great, but saying he was "the" reason as if another guy didn't drop 43 is funny
Did you watch the game? Wiggins was part of every play when they went like 8 point shift. Curry was 2-4 when it mattered on the 4th and padded his numbers a bit in the end when it was over.
Combine this all with elite defense all game long.
Jesus freaking Christ...
Some of you guys are absolutely ridiculous. The only reason they were even in this game to begin with is because Curry had one of the best games of his career. Like, I dislike certain players too, but at a certain point, respect the game. Or why are you even watching?
AussieCeltic wrote:GusFring wrote:marson wrote:Celts choked that one lol. Good to see.
I would take a 32 year old Jimmy Buckets over Jayson Tatum any time, any day of the week.
Who wouldn't? Browns been their star all series
Guess y’all forgetting about Butler getting swept against the Bucks 2 playoffs ago while averaging 14 points on 29% shooting.
Even though Tatum is struggling, he still has never put up a stinker like Butler.