Woj: JaMychal Green to OKC

Post #1 » by **MoneyTalks41890** » Mon Jun 13, 2022 4:33 pm

Read on Twitter

?s=21&t=J18sHQogNJN39NxinQjF6w

kalenclayton · Post #2 » by **kalenclayton** » Mon Jun 13, 2022 4:33 pm

Read on Twitter

?s=21&t=UcfgOUMJKOECNe3Vin-tLg

ejftw · Post #3 » by **ejftw** » Mon Jun 13, 2022 4:34 pm

Interesting, wonder if JMyke can be a buy out candidate, would love him back in with the Clips

HornetJail · Post #4 » by **HornetJail** » Mon Jun 13, 2022 4:37 pm

Presti strikes again

Post #5 » by **MoneyTalks41890** » Mon Jun 13, 2022 4:38 pm

Let me know if anyone sees the protections. I’m going to guess top 10.

moss_is_1 · Post #6 » by **moss_is_1** » Mon Jun 13, 2022 4:38 pm

Curious on the protections for the 1st.

cjmcallist · Post #7 » by **cjmcallist** » Mon Jun 13, 2022 4:38 pm

Uh oh. Bad sign for DEN. Cutting costs already.

Not that JM was a GameChanger but I do think he helped a bit.

Wonder what those protections are. Probably heavy protected, but if I’m DEN I hate tying up a future FRP in a salary dump like this.

HornetJail · Post #8 » by **HornetJail** » Mon Jun 13, 2022 4:39 pm

cjmcallist wrote:Uh oh. Bad sign for DEN. Cutting costs already.

Not that JM was a GameChanger but I do think he helped a bit.

Wonder what those protections are. Probably heavy protected, but if I’m DEN I hate tying up a future FRP in a salary dump like this.

basically a repeat of Utah salary dumping Favors. A move that is going to be very painful if they do decide to tear down

Post #9 » by **Dadouv47** » Mon Jun 13, 2022 4:40 pm

Don't like this that much for OKC....maybe because I want us to draft at least 3 players and move up with either #12 or to the early 20"s

Post #10 » by **MoneyTalks41890** » Mon Jun 13, 2022 4:45 pm

Dadouv47 wrote:Don't like this that much for OKC....maybe because I want us to draft at least 3 players and move up with either #12 or to the early 20"s

I think OKC could still easily move around in the draft without 30. And the DEN 1st is going to be a better asset unless it’s top 25 protected.

moss_is_1 · Post #11 » by **moss_is_1** » Mon Jun 13, 2022 4:48 pm

Dadouv47 wrote:Don't like this that much for OKC....maybe because I want us to draft at least 3 players and move up with either #12 or to the early 20"s

I think it's very good for OKC. Future 1st(though very distant), and a good veteran for #30 and future 2nds. Green should have some value, and you don't want 4 rookies. Thunder have plenty of ammo to move around.

K_chile22 · Post #12 » by **K_chile22** » Mon Jun 13, 2022 4:48 pm

moss_is_1 wrote:
Dadouv47 wrote:Don't like this that much for OKC....maybe because I want us to draft at least 3 players and move up with either #12 or to the early 20"s

I think it's very good for OKC. Future 1st(though very distant), and a good veteran for #30 and future 2nds. Green should have some value, and you don't want 4 rookies. Thunder have plenty of ammo to move around.

If green had value on his deal he'd opt out not in

Post #13 » by **Mavrelous** » Mon Jun 13, 2022 4:49 pm

Presti addiction to future 1sts is nearing unhealthy territory.

Post #14 » by **Snakebites** » Mon Jun 13, 2022 4:49 pm

Solid leveraging of assets for OKC.

They didn’t really need the 30 this year.

Laimbeer · Post #15 » by **Laimbeer** » Mon Jun 13, 2022 4:49 pm

MoneyTalks41890 wrote:Let me know if anyone sees the protections. I’m going to guess top 10.

That would be a heist.

Post #16 » by **Texas Chuck** » Mon Jun 13, 2022 4:55 pm

Yeah on value its probably good for both--assuming Denver got reasonable protections on the future pick. They save some money, get a cost controlled player immediately and get a couple 2nds. OKC turns the last pick in the 1st round into a pick that can't be any worse and it keeps the pick alive as an asset as opposed to getting turned into a player that some teams may not value.

youngthegiant · Post #17 » by **youngthegiant** » Mon Jun 13, 2022 4:56 pm

I like this for Denver, got an additional first in their win now window, two future 2nds and created an 8 million TPE to potentially fill a need. Solid trade for our new gm Calvin Booth.

K_chile22 · Post #18 » by **K_chile22** » Mon Jun 13, 2022 4:57 pm

Think it's pretty much impossible to call this trade a win or loss for anyone without protections and details on the seconds yet

mademan · Post #19 » by **mademan** » Mon Jun 13, 2022 5:01 pm

not a loss yet for Denver, but this basically means they cant move the 2026 or 2028 1st rounders. Limits their flexibility to save a few bucks

youngthegiant · Post #20 » by **youngthegiant** » Mon Jun 13, 2022 5:03 pm

mademan wrote:not a loss yet for Denver, but this basically means they cant move the 2026 or 2028 1st rounders. Limits their flexibility to save a few bucks

They couldn't move those anyways. They only had 2027 and 2029 to trade.