Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

MannyRam99
Banned User
Posts: 3,321
And1: 33
Joined: Apr 28, 2012

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#501 » by MannyRam99 » Sun Jul 8, 2012 9:55 pm

Jordan45822 wrote:
Adrian Wojnarowski ‏@WojYahooNBA
Bynum has shown no inclination to agree to an immediate extension if sent to Orlando as part of a Dwight Howard package, sources tell Y!


there is your answer Laker fans
:x
User avatar
Jordan45822
RealGM
Posts: 13,564
And1: 1,891
Joined: Jun 18, 2007

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#502 » by Jordan45822 » Sun Jul 8, 2012 9:58 pm

Adrian Wojnarowski ‏@WojYahooNBA
Dallas and Cleveland are among teams with cap space that would interest Bynum in 2013 as a free agent, sources tell Y!
User avatar
J-Mezzy
RealGM
Posts: 22,246
And1: 3,870
Joined: Jan 21, 2004
Location: Orlando

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#503 » by J-Mezzy » Sun Jul 8, 2012 9:58 pm

Damn it! I was really hoping to trade him to LA. I can't stand the idea of getting Brook freaking Lopez + draft picks for Dwight
MannyRam99
Banned User
Posts: 3,321
And1: 33
Joined: Apr 28, 2012

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#504 » by MannyRam99 » Sun Jul 8, 2012 10:00 pm

J-Mezzy wrote:Damn it! I was really hoping to trade him to LA. I can't stand the idea of getting Brook freaking Lopez + draft picks for Dwight

you better hope your management doesn't re-sign that guy, he can't rebound worth a *****, but he does have a nice post game.

he is the polar opposite to Dwight.
WaffleRecord
Starter
Posts: 2,155
And1: 729
Joined: Aug 08, 2011
     

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#505 » by WaffleRecord » Sun Jul 8, 2012 10:00 pm

so Bynum is walking if Lakers don't lock him up now
User avatar
CB-Blazer
Head Coach
Posts: 7,161
And1: 545
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
       

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#506 » by CB-Blazer » Sun Jul 8, 2012 10:00 pm

Showtime:Part2 wrote:i just dont understand why cle would want humphries. makes 0 sense.


Because the guy is a double, double machine and would instantly become the best front court player on the Cavs?
TheXFactor
Banned User
Posts: 3,976
And1: 31
Joined: Apr 19, 2012

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#507 » by TheXFactor » Sun Jul 8, 2012 10:02 pm

Jordan45822 wrote:
Adrian Wojnarowski ‏@WojYahooNBA
Dallas and Cleveland are among teams with cap space that would interest Bynum in 2013 as a free agent, sources tell Y!


Cleveland :lol:
AhaAha
Junior
Posts: 409
And1: 15
Joined: Dec 11, 2010

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#508 » by AhaAha » Sun Jul 8, 2012 10:03 pm

Bynum: There’s only one team on my list :D
User avatar
Jordan45822
RealGM
Posts: 13,564
And1: 1,891
Joined: Jun 18, 2007

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#509 » by Jordan45822 » Sun Jul 8, 2012 10:04 pm

Alex Kennedy ‏@AlexKennedyNBA
Nets and Magic are looking for third team to take Kris Humphries. As @TommyDeeTKB said, Cavs are possibility. 76ers are also a possibility.
User avatar
Jordan45822
RealGM
Posts: 13,564
And1: 1,891
Joined: Jun 18, 2007

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#510 » by Jordan45822 » Sun Jul 8, 2012 10:08 pm

Adrian Wojnarowski ‏@WojYahooNBA
If Magic and Lakers want to do a deal, each may need to call the bluff on Howard and Bynum stated unwillingness to accept extensions.
User avatar
Jordan45822
RealGM
Posts: 13,564
And1: 1,891
Joined: Jun 18, 2007

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#511 » by Jordan45822 » Sun Jul 8, 2012 10:11 pm

Adrian Wojnarowski ‏@WojYahooNBA
Among Bynum's short list of potential free agent landing spots in 2013, Houston is prominent with Dallas and Cleveland, sources tell Y!
Manimal
Veteran
Posts: 2,624
And1: 2,121
Joined: Dec 14, 2011

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#512 » by Manimal » Sun Jul 8, 2012 10:13 pm

TheXFactor wrote:
Jordan45822 wrote:
Adrian Wojnarowski ‏@WojYahooNBA
Dallas and Cleveland are among teams with cap space that would interest Bynum in 2013 as a free agent, sources tell Y!


Cleveland :lol:


They have a better future than the Lakers right now.
Trader_Joe
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 29,176
And1: 3,953
Joined: Jan 19, 2009
 

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#513 » by Trader_Joe » Sun Jul 8, 2012 10:13 pm

Jordan45822 wrote:
Adrian Wojnarowski ‏@WojYahooNBA
If Magic and Lakers want to do a deal, each may need to call the bluff on Howard and Bynum stated unwillingness to accept extensions.

I think Bynum is more of a flight risk than Dwight. Orlando is looking like a franchise in disarray for the foreseeable future with out without Bynum. Dallas, Atlata and others will do their best to pounce on Bynum or Dwight.
Mikhail Prokhorov wrote:My posse usually needs another vacation after a vacation with me.
The Skyhook
RealGM
Posts: 11,432
And1: 925
Joined: Sep 16, 2008
 

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#514 » by The Skyhook » Sun Jul 8, 2012 10:14 pm

The Lakers are far more confident Howard would have reasons to re-sign with them, than Magic have that Bynum would in a rebuild in Orlando.
User avatar
Jordan45822
RealGM
Posts: 13,564
And1: 1,891
Joined: Jun 18, 2007

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#515 » by Jordan45822 » Sun Jul 8, 2012 10:15 pm

Adrian Wojnarowski ‏@WojYahooNBA
The Lakers are far more confident Howard would have reasons to re-sign with them, than Magic have that Bynum would in a rebuild in Orlando.
OOO
Banned User
Posts: 1,554
And1: 22
Joined: Apr 04, 2012

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#516 » by OOO » Sun Jul 8, 2012 10:15 pm

Both are bluffing. Hard.
Trader_Joe
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 29,176
And1: 3,953
Joined: Jan 19, 2009
 

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#517 » by Trader_Joe » Sun Jul 8, 2012 10:15 pm

Jordan45822 wrote:
Adrian Wojnarowski ‏@WojYahooNBA
The Lakers are far more confident Howard would have reasons to re-sign with them, than Magic have that Bynum would in a rebuild in Orlando.

LOL
I just said that a few posts up.
Mikhail Prokhorov wrote:My posse usually needs another vacation after a vacation with me.
TheXFactor
Banned User
Posts: 3,976
And1: 31
Joined: Apr 19, 2012

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#518 » by TheXFactor » Sun Jul 8, 2012 10:21 pm

Image

:lol:
Dajadeed
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,379
And1: 1,643
Joined: Feb 28, 2009
   

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#519 » by Dajadeed » Sun Jul 8, 2012 10:22 pm

Manimal wrote:
They have a better future than the Lakers right now.


:lol: :lol: :lol:
Showtime:Part2
General Manager
Posts: 8,434
And1: 514
Joined: Jul 12, 2003

Re: Lakers no longer require extension from Dwight Howard 

Post#520 » by Showtime:Part2 » Sun Jul 8, 2012 10:24 pm

wait wait wait, is drew threatening to not re-sign with LA?
Warspite:

Prince + filler for Kobe Bryant
To be honest the way Prince has played and with Kobes injury/age/mileage Im not sure I would do that deal either. Still Prince is more important and he wins the head to head battles with Kobe.

Return to The General Board