MyUniBroDavis wrote:eminence wrote:I kinda think CP3 and Dray might love one another on the same team.
Yeah they should get along, they’re part of the same friend group or something right?
Bourre buddies?
Moderators: Doctor MJ, Clyde Frazier, penbeast0, trex_8063, PaulieWal
MyUniBroDavis wrote:eminence wrote:I kinda think CP3 and Dray might love one another on the same team.
Yeah they should get along, they’re part of the same friend group or something right?
parsnips33 wrote:Nobody on that team liked Poole lol Draymond was the only guy crazy enough to do something about it
It’s also true that Poole was well-liked in the locker room. He’s close with most of the other players, including Andrew Wiggins, Donte DiVincenzo, Kevon Looney and Gary Payton II.
Colbinii wrote:1993Playoffs wrote:CP3 Curry and Dray on the same team.
Not to be confused with Carmelo, Westbrook, Dwight and LeBron on the same team
LookToShoot wrote:Melo is the only player that makes the Rockets watchable for the basketball purists. Otherwise it would just be three point shots and pick n roll.
eminence wrote:Replacement player is a concept that's used quite a bit, usually estimated at a -2 to -2.5 on an impact scale.
What level would y'all estimate a 'replacement team' on a net rating scale? How accurate do you feel looking at the first year of all expansion teams would be at estimating such a number?
Edit: For info's sake the expansion teams post-merger have averaged a -8.3 net rating in their first seasons.
tsherkin wrote:Locked due to absence of adult conversation.
penbeast0 wrote:Guys, if you don't have anything to say, don't post.
E-Balla wrote:LeBron is Jeff George.
G35 wrote:Lebron is not that far off from WB in trade value.
The-Power wrote:parsnips33 wrote:Nobody on that team liked Poole lol Draymond was the only guy crazy enough to do something about it
What's the reason for this hyperbole when it's obviously incorrect? Obviously we won't ever truly know how every player felt about him but the statement that ‘nobody liked him’ is demonstrably false. Just... plain wrong. You might be projecting here.
Just two of the many examples you can find in one minute:It’s also true that Poole was well-liked in the locker room. He’s close with most of the other players, including Andrew Wiggins, Donte DiVincenzo, Kevon Looney and Gary Payton II.
https://www.santacruzsentinel.com/2023/05/20/warriors-offseason-the-misconceptions-around-jordan-poole/
Poole has always been a cheerleader for everyone and you can easily see in the way he interacts with teammates and how they talk about him that he's very well-liked. Up and down the roster, including with two-way players (such as Weatherspoon). Perhaps the older generation was at times annoyed by him but that has nothing to do with whether they liked him. It was a Draymond problem, and that was obvious at the time and it is obvious now.
eminence wrote:I'm pretty happy with the draft for the Jazz. Hendricks seems like a good solid fit, and then two high upside swings on the perimeter.
Mogspan wrote:I think they see the super rare combo of high IQ with freakish athleticism and overrate the former a bit, kind of like a hot girl who is rather articulate being thought of as “super smart.” I don’t know kind of a weird analogy, but you catch my drift.
The-Power wrote:parsnips33 wrote:Nobody on that team liked Poole lol Draymond was the only guy crazy enough to do something about it
What's the reason for this hyperbole when it's obviously incorrect? Obviously we won't ever truly know how every player felt about him but the statement that ‘nobody liked him’ is demonstrably false. Just... plain wrong. You might be projecting here.
Just two of the many examples you can find in one minute:It’s also true that Poole was well-liked in the locker room. He’s close with most of the other players, including Andrew Wiggins, Donte DiVincenzo, Kevon Looney and Gary Payton II.
https://www.santacruzsentinel.com/2023/05/20/warriors-offseason-the-misconceptions-around-jordan-poole/
Poole has always been a cheerleader for everyone and you can easily see in the way he interacts with teammates and how they talk about him that he's very well-liked. Up and down the roster, including with two-way players (such as Weatherspoon). Perhaps the older generation was at times annoyed by him but that has nothing to do with whether they liked him. It was a Draymond problem, and that was obvious at the time and it is obvious now.
parsnips33 wrote:I think if he was really so well-liked, the Draymond incident would have resolved differently
ardee wrote:People are really forgetting how good Poole was in the title year, particularly the last one third of the RS and then the Playoffs.
This trade will come back to bite GSW in the behind. His dropoff this year was due to a specific incident and he is going to be fine in an environment where he doesn't have to interact with his attacker daily. Meanwhile the team that traded him has given up their future.
ardee wrote:People are really forgetting how good Poole was in the title year, particularly the last one third of the RS and then the Playoffs.
This trade will come back to bite GSW in the behind. His dropoff this year was due to a specific incident and he is going to be fine in an environment where he doesn't have to interact with his attacker daily. Meanwhile the team that traded him has given up their future.
Doctor MJ wrote:ardee wrote:People are really forgetting how good Poole was in the title year, particularly the last one third of the RS and then the Playoffs.
This trade will come back to bite GSW in the behind. His dropoff this year was due to a specific incident and he is going to be fine in an environment where he doesn't have to interact with his attacker daily. Meanwhile the team that traded him has given up their future.
I don't think there's any doubt that the Warriors have no chosen the present over the future, so there will be a cost...but I also think that recognizing that Steph Curry is a talent far greater than any of the young guys (Poole, Wiseman, Kuminga, Moody) could realistically be hoped to be means that a move in this direction is wise if your goal is to maximize the Curry years.
That doesn't necessarily mean that this trade was a good move - time will tell - but there's a cold hard logic to this that just makes sense to me.
I just think it sucks all this happening in the wake of Draymond's punch.
I'll be pulling for Poole to find his groove again.
its my last message in this thread, but I just admit, that all the people, casual and analytical minds, more or less have consencus who has the weight of a rubberized duck. And its not JaivLLLL