winforlose wrote:Fun fact and unreal stat, (courtesy of Flagrant Howls,) “The Wolves are 7 points worse per 100 possessions when Kyle Anderson is on the court.”
Can we trade him yet!?
In my best Nostradamus prediction.... NO.
Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks
winforlose wrote:Fun fact and unreal stat, (courtesy of Flagrant Howls,) “The Wolves are 7 points worse per 100 possessions when Kyle Anderson is on the court.”
Can we trade him yet!?
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
Klomp wrote:
winforlose wrote:Klomp wrote:
Take it one step further. We blew a lead against OKC, against Boston, against Dallas, and should have beat the Knicks but for some uncharacteristically bad first half play. It’s not like we got blown out in all 11. We are actually better than our record suggests, and we are the best in the west, 2nd best in the NBA, and best against good teams.
KGdaBom wrote:winforlose wrote:Klomp wrote:
Take it one step further. We blew a lead against OKC, against Boston, against Dallas, and should have beat the Knicks but for some uncharacteristically bad first half play. It’s not like we got blown out in all 11. We are actually better than our record suggests, and we are the best in the west, 2nd best in the NBA, and best against good teams.
I appreciate this. Most Wolves fans think we are far worse than our record suggests. Some go so far as to think we are bad or even suck. I've just been going by we are who our record says we are.
winforlose wrote:KGdaBom wrote:winforlose wrote:
Take it one step further. We blew a lead against OKC, against Boston, against Dallas, and should have beat the Knicks but for some uncharacteristically bad first half play. It’s not like we got blown out in all 11. We are actually better than our record suggests, and we are the best in the west, 2nd best in the NBA, and best against good teams.
I appreciate this. Most Wolves fans think we are far worse than our record suggests. Some go so far as to think we are bad or even suck. I've just been going by we are who our record says we are.
Detroit is a great example of a team better than their record. They play great in the first half, compete very well with top teams in both conferences, then find ways to lose. We find ways to lose games we should win. Starting with Atlanta and most recently Chicago with at least half a dozen examples in between. We are good enough to go up 20, we should be good enough to win by at least 10.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.
Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
winforlose wrote:My brother just sent me this. Unreal and infuriating.
The link failed. Correction, it was a survey of NBA players with 98 voting. Jaden got 5.4 votes. Rudy and NAW not listed.
It was presented as a chart from the athletic.
KGdaBom wrote:winforlose wrote:My brother just sent me this. Unreal and infuriating.
The link failed. Correction, it was a survey of NBA players with 98 voting. Jaden got 5.4 votes. Rudy and NAW not listed.
It was presented as a chart from the athletic.
Voting for what? How can Jaden get 5.4 votes?
winforlose wrote:Worth noting as a fun fact, we are 22 games above .500.
KGdaBom wrote:winforlose wrote:Worth noting as a fun fact, we are 22 games above .500.
98 votes and not one for Rudy? Something is wrong.
winforlose wrote:KGdaBom wrote:winforlose wrote:Worth noting as a fun fact, we are 22 games above .500.
98 votes and not one for Rudy? Something is wrong.
That is literally what I texted back. All he sent me was a graphic from the athletic. Maybe someone on here who has a membership can look it up?
KGdaBom wrote:winforlose wrote:My brother just sent me this. Unreal and infuriating.
The link failed. Correction, it was a survey of NBA players with 98 voting. Jaden got 5.4 votes. Rudy and NAW not listed.
It was presented as a chart from the athletic.
Voting for what? How can Jaden get 5.4 votes?
frankenwolf wrote:KGdaBom wrote:winforlose wrote:My brother just sent me this. Unreal and infuriating.
The link failed. Correction, it was a survey of NBA players with 98 voting. Jaden got 5.4 votes. Rudy and NAW not listed.
It was presented as a chart from the athletic.
Voting for what? How can Jaden get 5.4 votes?
Found it!! It was an April, 2023 post. It was the Athletics year end anonymous player poll. Reflects nothing current, obviously. Old, dead, news
frankenwolf wrote:KGdaBom wrote:winforlose wrote:My brother just sent me this. Unreal and infuriating.
The link failed. Correction, it was a survey of NBA players with 98 voting. Jaden got 5.4 votes. Rudy and NAW not listed.
It was presented as a chart from the athletic.
Voting for what? How can Jaden get 5.4 votes?
Found it!! It was an April, 2023 post. It was the Athletics year end anonymous player poll. Reflects nothing current, obviously. Old, dead, news
Return to Minnesota Timberwolves