Threezus wrote:I think best Hawks could do would be Murray, OO, Griffin, and a pick or 2.
Would you add your picks this year if we added ours?
So something like Murray, OO, Griffin, #10, #16 for Towns, filler (maybe Moore Jr and Minott?), #27?
Moderators: Trader_Joe, loserX, Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Threezus wrote:I think best Hawks could do would be Murray, OO, Griffin, and a pick or 2.
zimpy27 wrote:Something like this could work:
MIN get Markannen
UTA get Assets from 3rd team, unprotecting of MIN29FRP(6-30)
3rd team get KAT
Maybe Brooklyn, Dallas, Lakers or Atlanta are the 3rd team
zimpy27 wrote:Something like this could work:
MIN get Markannen
UTA get Assets from 3rd team, unprotecting of MIN29FRP(6-30)
3rd team get KAT
Maybe Brooklyn, Dallas, Lakers or Atlanta are the 3rd team
Wolveswin wrote:zimpy27 wrote:Something like this could work:
MIN get Markannen
UTA get Assets from 3rd team, unprotecting of MIN29FRP(6-30)
3rd team get KAT
Maybe Brooklyn, Dallas, Lakers or Atlanta are the 3rd team
That would be HUGE risk for Wolves. Losing Markkanen which means trading Towns for nothing. Wolves would need to get back own 29 and 27 1st for sure in this deal.
HartfordWhalers wrote:Wolveswin wrote:zimpy27 wrote:Something like this could work:
MIN get Markannen
UTA get Assets from 3rd team, unprotecting of MIN29FRP(6-30)
3rd team get KAT
Maybe Brooklyn, Dallas, Lakers or Atlanta are the 3rd team
That would be HUGE risk for Wolves. Losing Markkanen which means trading Towns for nothing. Wolves would need to get back own 29 and 27 1st for sure in this deal.
I don’t have that realistic as an ask.
Similarly Utah could claim the length and size of Towns contract is a risk worth u protected picks.
Matches Malone wrote:How did NBA fandom get to the point that it's more fun to thirst over players on other teams than to care more about your own team and players...
HartfordWhalers wrote:Wolveswin wrote:zimpy27 wrote:Something like this could work:
MIN get Markannen
UTA get Assets from 3rd team, unprotecting of MIN29FRP(6-30)
3rd team get KAT
Maybe Brooklyn, Dallas, Lakers or Atlanta are the 3rd team
That would be HUGE risk for Wolves. Losing Markkanen which means trading Towns for nothing. Wolves would need to get back own 29 and 27 1st for sure in this deal.
I don’t have that realistic as an ask.
Similarly Utah could claim the length and size of Towns contract is a risk worth u protected picks.
schaffy wrote:HartfordWhalers wrote:Wolveswin wrote:That would be HUGE risk for Wolves. Losing Markkanen which means trading Towns for nothing. Wolves would need to get back own 29 and 27 1st for sure in this deal.
I don’t have that realistic as an ask.
Similarly Utah could claim the length and size of Towns contract is a risk worth u protected picks.
Since they aren't the ones who end up acquiring Towns in this scenario it wouldn't be the best argument to make since its not the risk they are taking.
HartfordWhalers wrote:schaffy wrote:HartfordWhalers wrote:
I don’t have that realistic as an ask.
Similarly Utah could claim the length and size of Towns contract is a risk worth u protected picks.
Since they aren't the ones who end up acquiring Towns in this scenario it wouldn't be the best argument to make since its not the risk they are taking.
Sure. Unnamed team could make unrealistic demands of Minnesota to match Minnesota fans unrealistic demands if you prefer..
GoBobs wrote:Any Towns deal really depends on what Minny is try to accomplish.
Next year they have basically 160 mil committed between 5 guys: Reid, Towns, Gobert, Edwards, McDaniels (still need a pg)
Do they want to get a better fit but willing to stay at a high salary?, then maybe Towns for Trae or similar
Do they want to just save money because ownership can't stomach the spending?, maybe Towns for expiring and picks
GoBobs wrote:Landscape will be different after the playoffs, but I will throw a few ideas out there.
Towns for Durrant
Towns for Beal
Towns for Lillard
Towns for J. Holiday and Al Horford
These are the type of deals I see getting done if he gets moved. A move that just saves money and makes the team worse would be very unpopular and might even end up with the team eventually getting moved.
GoBobs wrote:Landscape will be different after the playoffs, but I will throw a few ideas out there.
Towns for Durrant
Towns for Beal
Towns for Lillard
Towns for J. Holiday and Al Horford
These are the type of deals I see getting done if he gets moved. A move that just saves money and makes the team worse would be very unpopular and might even end up with the team eventually getting moved.
HartfordWhalers wrote:schaffy wrote:HartfordWhalers wrote:
I don’t have that realistic as an ask.
Similarly Utah could claim the length and size of Towns contract is a risk worth u protected picks.
Since they aren't the ones who end up acquiring Towns in this scenario it wouldn't be the best argument to make since its not the risk they are taking.
Sure. Unnamed team could make unrealistic demands of Minnesota to match Minnesota fans unrealistic demands if you prefer..
OriAr wrote:Spurs can put in a competitive offer and the fit next to Wemby is pretty good on paper... But I don't know if they should take contracts this early in the rebuild.
Return to Trades and Transactions