Wizenheimer wrote:I'm assuming "resolution" means there was a settlement that involved money changing hands. Settlement/resolution are synonymous terms when lawsuits are 'resolved/settled' out of court. I think you guys are likely reading too much in the use of the word 'resolution'; a distinction without a difference
I personally wasn't reading into anything outside of the initial quote I saw that the lawsuit had been withdrawn,
Semantics aside, I genuinely couldn't care less if they settled with some financial compensation or not. Maybe I was wrong if saying it was frivolous, we'll never know, so it doesn't really matter. All that matters imo is this is out of the way, it won't slow down the sale to Dundon and the Cherngs are still part of the group - providing the Blazers some serious financial backing in the new group.
Also glad the RAJ group has nothing to do with the Blazers. Just from what I can see from the outside looking in based off their work with the Fire and the Kangz, they don't present themselves as a very strong sports ownership group. The Fire rollout has been messy from the jump, and while I'm probably overestimating their involvement / say with the Kings (they only control 20%, Vivek is majority owner at 65%), I'm totally fine not having anyone involved with that organization having a say with how the Blazers are operated.
Dundon at least has a proven track record as a sports owner.







