gbmb34 wrote:Barnes will never be a top 20 guy. No defense.
His D looks fundamentally good to me, particularly for a rookie wing.
Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25
gbmb34 wrote:Barnes will never be a top 20 guy. No defense.
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.
GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
AussieBuck wrote:gbmb34 wrote:Barnes will never be a top 20 guy. No defense.
His D looks fundamentally good to me, particularly for a rookie wing.
Baddy Chuck wrote:I want to win but I also love chaos.
fishnc wrote:If I had a gun with two bullets and I was in a room with Hitler, Bin Laden, and LeBron, I would shoot LeBron twice.
AussieBuck wrote:gbmb34 wrote:Barnes will never be a top 20 guy. No defense.
His D looks fundamentally good to me, particularly for a rookie wing.
HurricaneKid wrote:Landry >>>>>>>>>> Mbah
Barnes >>> Henson
Furthermore, Landry makes less than Mbah.
This is completely a non-starter as GSW are VERY high on Barnes.
whatthe_buck!? wrote:HurricaneKid wrote:Landry >>>>>>>>>> Mbah
Barnes >>> Henson
Furthermore, Landry makes less than Mbah.
This is completely a non-starter as GSW are VERY high on Barnes.
Barnes>>>>>Henson?? Like how? How good a player he is right now? How good each projects to be? Because I take Henson over Barnes as far as who I think has a higher ceiling. Skilled long athletic shotblocking PF >>>> Skilled? long athletic SG 7 times out of 10...
coolhandluke121 wrote:Apparently Poppovich cursed Howard out at the AS game for mingling with celebrities during a time-out when Pop was calling a play for him. My man-crush on Pop is reaching epic proportions.
paul wrote:whatthe_buck!? wrote:HurricaneKid wrote:Landry >>>>>>>>>> Mbah
Barnes >>> Henson
Furthermore, Landry makes less than Mbah.
This is completely a non-starter as GSW are VERY high on Barnes.
Barnes>>>>>Henson?? Like how? How good a player he is right now? How good each projects to be? Because I take Henson over Barnes as far as who I think has a higher ceiling. Skilled long athletic shotblocking PF >>>> Skilled? long athletic SG 7 times out of 10...
Like Henson as much as you want, Barnes has without any shadow of a doubt had a more impressive rookie season thus far.
Guy has played a major starting role on a good team all season long and has shown a ton.
whatthe_buck!? wrote:paul wrote:whatthe_buck!? wrote:Barnes>>>>>Henson?? Like how? How good a player he is right now? How good each projects to be? Because I take Henson over Barnes as far as who I think has a higher ceiling. Skilled long athletic shotblocking PF >>>> Skilled? long athletic SG 7 times out of 10...
Like Henson as much as you want, Barnes has without any shadow of a doubt had a more impressive rookie season thus far.
Guy has played a major starting role on a good team all season long and has shown a ton.
So u agree with hurricanekid that Barnes>>>>Henson then?
stellation wrote:You know, someone actually doing a frigging trade wouldn't hurt.
paul wrote:whatthe_buck!? wrote:paul wrote:Like Henson as much as you want, Barnes has without any shadow of a doubt had a more impressive rookie season thus far.
Guy has played a major starting role on a good team all season long and has shown a ton.
So u agree with hurricanekid that Barnes>>>>Henson then?
As of today? No question.
Into the future? Henson is starting behind but has further room for progression so has every chance to end up being the better player. I'm not as high on Henson as many are though, mainly because his defense has been utterly disgusting lol. Hopefully it comes around. His offense consists entirely of touch ball-shoot ball so we'll see how that turns out.
N8Frog wrote:stellation wrote:You know, someone actually doing a frigging trade wouldn't hurt.
I know!
stellation wrote:You know, someone actually doing a frigging trade wouldn't hurt.