Badonkadonk wrote:Randle McMurphy wrote:Badonkadonk wrote:'Usually' implies a regular occurrence.
That makes it, by definition, 'not a fluke'.
Pretty sure Nurse's judgment that McCaw is actually a rotation player trumps the opinion of people who only see counting stats.
Counting stats? Don’t you mean the advanced stats that show him to be one of the worst players in the league?
I've seen those arguments, the issue there is sample size and development. The numbers will normalize with minutes AND with steady improvement.
What I don't understand is people who are convinced he's not worth the development cycles, for a NUMBER of reasons, but not the least of which are these two: the Raps have a strong history of improving players and Nick Nurse has earned the the benefit of the doubt.
Sample size? He’s been terrible for four NBA seasons. No amount of minutes is going to change that.
When the Raptors are fully healthy, he should never even see the floor.




















