Andrew Wiggins vs. Giannis Antetokounmpo

Moderators: trex_8063, penbeast0, PaulieWal, Clyde Frazier, Doctor MJ

Who is the better prospect?

Wiggins
28
30%
Giannis
65
70%
 
Total votes: 93

CometGM
Senior
Posts: 730
And1: 743
Joined: Jul 12, 2015

Re: Andrew Wiggins vs. Giannis Antetokounmpo 

Post#81 » by CometGM » Tue Jun 27, 2017 4:07 pm

Tinseltown wrote:Well I was right on Wiggins being a bust even though my topics on the subject here were locked but I think only Bucks fans saw Giannis being this good


Wiggins a bust? The guy just averaged 23.6ppg. He's no Giannis but he's nowhere near close to being a bust. Even if he doesn't improve from here on out, which he will anyway, he can't be considered a bust even though he hasn't lived up to some people's expectations.
User avatar
oaktownwarriors87
RealGM
Posts: 13,855
And1: 4,418
Joined: Mar 01, 2005
 

Re: Andrew Wiggins vs. Giannis Antetokounmpo 

Post#82 » by oaktownwarriors87 » Tue Jun 27, 2017 4:12 pm

Colbinii wrote:Giannis has quickly become the most overrated prospect in the NBA. He is extremely Raw, but has all of the measurables. A player as Raw as him will never round off a complete skill set and will be lucky to have one or two basketball skills that end up in the elite department outside of measurables/athleticism.


I gave you an and 1, figured you could use it.
cdubbz wrote:Donte DiVincenzo will outplay Poole this season.
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,858
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: Andrew Wiggins vs. Giannis Antetokounmpo 

Post#83 » by Colbinii » Tue Jun 27, 2017 4:36 pm

oaktownwarriors87 wrote:
Colbinii wrote:Giannis has quickly become the most overrated prospect in the NBA. He is extremely Raw, but has all of the measurables. A player as Raw as him will never round off a complete skill set and will be lucky to have one or two basketball skills that end up in the elite department outside of measurables/athleticism.


I gave you an and 1, figured you could use it.


I am as accurate as all the experts :D
Xherdan 23
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,324
And1: 1,537
Joined: Apr 07, 2016
   

Re: Andrew Wiggins vs. Giannis Antetokounmpo 

Post#84 » by Xherdan 23 » Tue Jun 27, 2017 4:56 pm

etopn23 wrote:This thread is going to look (Please Use More Appropriate Word) in 3 years. I dunno when people started trashing Wiggins. He is raw, he will develop. Everything he has said shows that he *will* work to become a better player.

Giannis is not near the prospect that Wiggins is.


Well, almost three years later this thread does look a bit (Please Use More Appropriate Word), just not in the same way you expected...
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. But, in practice, there is.
- Jan L. A. van de Snepscheut
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,048
And1: 70,236
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: Andrew Wiggins vs. Giannis Antetokounmpo 

Post#85 » by clyde21 » Tue Jun 27, 2017 5:08 pm

Tinseltown wrote:Well I was right on Wiggins being a bust even though my topics on the subject here were locked but I think only Bucks fans saw Giannis being this good


No, you really weren't.
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
ISB
Rookie
Posts: 1,235
And1: 210
Joined: Nov 23, 2006

Re: Andrew Wiggins vs. Giannis Antetokounmpo 

Post#86 » by ISB » Wed Jun 28, 2017 10:09 pm

I remember when Wiggins was in college I was supposedly a "Wiggins hater" when I thought his upside was more of a Paul George than a true superstar. Now I realize that was a super optimistic comparison. Wiggins is okay but oh my god was he overhyped in High School.
User avatar
homecourtloss
RealGM
Posts: 11,494
And1: 18,885
Joined: Dec 29, 2012

Re: Andrew Wiggins vs. Giannis Antetokounmpo 

Post#87 » by homecourtloss » Wed Jun 28, 2017 10:47 pm

clyde21 wrote:
Tinseltown wrote:Well I was right on Wiggins being a bust even though my topics on the subject here were locked but I think only Bucks fans saw Giannis being this good


No, you really weren't.


I guess it depends upon how one defines "bust." In its strictest sense, probably not because he's a useful offensive player of sorts.

As an all around player impact wise relative to expectations and hype, he's a bust. He's played 9,000 minutes and has a VORP of -.8. For a guy who was a #1 pick type of talent, that's terrible. -2.4 BPM primarily because of his poor team defense given his athletic tools available? Pretty terrible.
lessthanjake wrote:Kyrie was extremely impactful without LeBron, and basically had zero impact whatsoever if LeBron was on the court.

lessthanjake wrote: By playing in a way that prevents Kyrie from getting much impact, LeBron ensures that controlling for Kyrie has limited effect…
ISB
Rookie
Posts: 1,235
And1: 210
Joined: Nov 23, 2006

Re: Andrew Wiggins vs. Giannis Antetokounmpo 

Post#88 » by ISB » Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:09 pm

homecourtloss wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
Tinseltown wrote:Well I was right on Wiggins being a bust even though my topics on the subject here were locked but I think only Bucks fans saw Giannis being this good


No, you really weren't.


I guess it depends upon how one defines "bust." In its strictest sense, probably not because he's a useful offensive player of sorts.

As an all around player impact wise relative to expectations and hype, he's a bust. He's played 9,000 minutes and has a VORP of -.8. For a guy who was a #1 pick type of talent, that's terrible. -2.4 BPM primarily because of his poor team defense given his athletic tools available? Pretty terrible.


I think he's a huge bust relative to HS hype, but only a minor bust relative to pre-draft hype.
H2tObes
RealGM
Posts: 19,562
And1: 10,022
Joined: Oct 18, 2012

Re: Andrew Wiggins vs. Giannis Antetokounmpo 

Post#89 » by H2tObes » Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:14 pm

There's a reason why 100% of Bucks fans were completely enamored, Bucks fans were the only one who watched him
User avatar
Joseph17
RealGM
Posts: 10,430
And1: 529
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Location: New York
   

Re: Andrew Wiggins vs. Giannis Antetokounmpo 

Post#90 » by Joseph17 » Sun Jul 2, 2017 2:47 pm

H2tObes wrote:There's a reason why 100% of Bucks fans were completely enamored, Bucks fans were the only one who watched him

Anyone who knows basketball would be able to tell that he has a lot of potential. I'm not a Bucks fan, but I've seen him play enough to know that he has a lot of potential which is why I created this thread in the first place. It kind of reminds me of when I was debating with people on here about Stephen Curry's potential. Everyone thought I was crazy for saying that he has all-star potential in the NBA. He even exceeded my expectations and became a superstar. As far as Giannis and Wiggins, both of them evolved into what I expected them to be. When Wiggins was drafted I said that I believed that he was a safer pick than Jabari Parker in the sense that I believed that he had a higher floor than Jabari and also a lower ceiling. Everyone else felt the opposite way including the experts.
User avatar
rockmanslim
RealGM
Posts: 11,816
And1: 7,243
Joined: Jul 15, 2008
   

Re: Andrew Wiggins vs. Giannis Antetokounmpo 

Post#91 » by rockmanslim » Sun Jul 2, 2017 8:00 pm

Ron Swanson wrote:There's some All-Time-Great crow-eating posts in this thread. But at the same time, I don't think that anyone could have predicted that Giannis would become this elite and Wiggins would become this average.

Edit: Oh god, the Anthony Randolph comparisons are still gold.

:lol:


Predicting Giannis was hard, but predicting Wiggins wasn't as hard.

By me:
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=1290020

viewtopic.php?p=37808786#p37808786

viewtopic.php?p=40149322#p40149322

viewtopic.php?p=41821420#p41821420

viewtopic.php?p=37838805#p37838805



By others:
viewtopic.php?p=40180466#p40180466
(plenty more in that thread)

viewtopic.php?p=38593210#p38593210

viewtopic.php?p=37359628#p37359628

viewtopic.php?p=38870247#p38870247

viewtopic.php?p=38667066#p38667066

viewtopic.php?p=42073874#p42073874

viewtopic.php?p=39057872#p39057872
click

"Harden's a guy that averages 26 in the NBA, but if he was on the playground with you he'd only average about 5 because they wouldn't let him get those free throws." --Scott Hastings, April 6, 2013


Image
HeartBreakKid
RealGM
Posts: 22,395
And1: 18,828
Joined: Mar 08, 2012
     

Re: Andrew Wiggins vs. Giannis Antetokounmpo 

Post#92 » by HeartBreakKid » Mon Jul 3, 2017 4:19 am

rockmanslim wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote:There's some All-Time-Great crow-eating posts in this thread. But at the same time, I don't think that anyone could have predicted that Giannis would become this elite and Wiggins would become this average.

Edit: Oh god, the Anthony Randolph comparisons are still gold.

:lol:


Predicting Giannis was hard, but predicting Wiggins wasn't as hard.

By me:
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=1290020

viewtopic.php?p=37808786#p37808786

viewtopic.php?p=40149322#p40149322

viewtopic.php?p=41821420#p41821420

viewtopic.php?p=37838805#p37838805



By others:
viewtopic.php?p=40180466#p40180466
(plenty more in that thread)

viewtopic.php?p=38593210#p38593210

viewtopic.php?p=37359628#p37359628

viewtopic.php?p=38870247#p38870247

viewtopic.php?p=38667066#p38667066

viewtopic.php?p=42073874#p42073874

viewtopic.php?p=39057872#p39057872



I'm still floored by how insanely hyped Wiggins was. It shows you the power of those highschool mixtape videos. One of those Wiggins videos of him hitting spin moves on 5'5 guards went viral, that was it - people made up his mind he was the next LBJ or T Mac even though he played nothing like them.

Return to Player Comparisons